- Edited
If you are referring to the collector I have fabricated, it does fit in the original space and location. Took lots of head scratching to make it work, but it is a bolt-on solution with a few little tweaks to tubingEx850R;c-160194 wroteThat's a nice collector, way better than std but std was made for tight spot.
Have you seen the builds where turbo is sat where the battery and airbox was originally, it's longer runner to it but it opens up options greatly. Like sequential turbo to get rid of low down lag?
It is clear that the Audi and BW engineers have put a lot of research and effort into this manifold/collector. Much more than a conventional turbo setup. Under 500hp I cannot see any way of improving its performance. Regarding relocation, I've built many "sidewinder" style manifolds for different engines and it has pro's and con's. Testing with thermocouples at the manifold entrance and at the turbo entrance I've seen differences of delta temperatures of up to 150`C.
On the plus-side, the engine will "see" a larger turbine housing as a significant amount of thermal energy is lost in the length of tubing. This means that the engine can make more peak power as it effectively has a larger turbine.
The cons include more radiating heat into the engine bay, a higher probability of breakage/failure and primarily a loss of transient response and spool due to the loss of thermal energy. You see this in WRX/STI's compared to a comparable engine with a comparable turbo as the manifold is so long. That is why Subaru has tried iterations of twin turbo, twin scroll and ball bearing to try and compete with Mitsubishi's simple and highly capable plain-bearing twin scroll setup...which happens to be a much larger turbo overall yet spools much faster