robv Awsome thanks, mine are 16, as you can see the strut gets closer to the wheel the smaller the diameter. U think I'll be safe?
deleted_user_160 Well you can tell that younger be safe with the above Simmons. Because they are on a 240 in the sale listing
GingerNinja robv;108120 wroteAwsome thanks, mine are 16, as you can see the strut gets closer to the wheel the smaller the diameter. U think I'll be safe? Yep, but what size were you going to use?
deleted_user_160 GingerNinja;108122 wrote What's the offset on those? To be honest I don't know the "et" don't know how to calculate it. What I do know is the linear metric offset. This is the steel wheels I had made.
GingerNinja blondejay;108124 wroteTo be honest I don't know the "et" don't know how to calculate it. What I do know is the linear metric offset. This is the steel wheels I had made. Looks good. You might be able to work it out by measuring the backspace and then converting it with an offset calculator. I've seen a few setups on turbobricks with 17x9" and a 245 tyre but I can't remember the offsets that worked on a 240.
Spac blondejay;108109 wroteThey look like original aussie Simmonds I don't think they're Simmons. Look like they were meant to have centre caps. The V5s and whatever their predecessor was called, both had webbing between the bolt holes.
deleted_user_160 Your right. The v4/5 both had a small amount of the mesh in the stupid section. Maybe csa? Though I can't remember who else used such a large concave design on the centers.
