Vee_Que;103930 wroteRepco heads were using stock small valves, but the ports are raised, they are aimed as being a road head, not an all out racing cylinder head. Not to mention it's a heron head and needs custom pistons with a combustion chamber in them, like a diesel does. And they run even exhaust and intake so need custom ground cams all the time to tune.
Scott's car beats the class above them with the b20 and high ratio roller rockers, otherwise it is a ported head b20e, it's all in the cam, he doesn't run ethical, he ran avgas last I checked too.
The fact is, Dynos are only measures of power, a drag strip will show the ability to get the power down, Andy whites car ran a 14.4 at Geelong revival a few years back, making the 160whp claim possible, on a drag racing to hp calculator for the weight it's about right. Same with my wagon, for its weight a 14.4 with 3.54 diff is about right. So mike can go on all day about supposed drive train loss of only 10%, I notice now he's also seen engine Dynos, but the reality doesn't line up with what you see.
Hrm...
Tentacle wagon (untuned B6304w/emissions cams) dyno'd 168whp (Shit tons of posts on this at the time on t-bricks)
4 different people took it for runs at PDX international raceway for a total of 15 runs (Shit tons of posts on this as it was with 4 other t-brick members)
fastest was 15.2 slowest was 15.4 average was 15.3
1/4 calculator says....
187.63hp with a known and reasonable weight of 3400lb (Car has been weighed a few times now)
The difference is 10%
Question is... what is a 1/4 calculator giving me?
Further note: Dyno results done in 3rd gear with TQ locked, 3rd on a AW30-40 is 1:1 near direct drive
Other random one... are we talking about Gross HP or SAE NET HP? (they are different)